![]() |
|
Register |
FAQ |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
a bit disappointing if I'm honest. But the dyno don't lie as they say.
There was a dyno day setup at a local shop. So i though I would join in. everything was set up for rear wheel drive or AWD vehicles so my car did not get any fans to blow on the intercooler but honestly the tune is a mile off on this car right now, but I know the tune is safe so I will be attending the convention as the car sits. Nothing fancy I guess. I really expected quite a bit more power. http://videos.streetfire.net/video/t...yno_696193.htm
__________________
1994 ATX green/mocha Turbo want to turbo your SHO? click here http://www.shoforum.com/showthread.php?t=80983 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
the fans should have been moved, we just all forgot
__________________
LOWroller: fawking christ ... i should be a god to these morons LOWroller: im going to the next meet and proclaiming myself to be the 2nd coming of jesus, instant cult following RJ-92: lol LOWroller: first new commandment ... send me all your hot female relatives for impregnation, but only blood relatives, i only want the ones that share the stupid gene |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
to be honest I didn't care all that much. the car isn't running that well + the amount of water that car sucked in today driving around in that down poor was insane. the car would probably run a high 13 or low 14 the way it sits now. that is a far cry from where it was a couple years ago.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
It still goes like stink.. You scared the crap out of me on route 3 with black on black... haha.. I wish i could help ya some with the tune.
(This is clay on Tim's SN, im too lazy to log him out.)
__________________
Tim: 95 Jeep Cherokee Sport, Red Found a nice(and red) 2nd gen SHO |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
yeah, but it's an ATX, so assuming a 20% loss through the driveline (they dont' call them slushboxes for nothing), that's still 337CHP. Which is, to put it mildly, Not Bad. Even with a 15% loss it's still 318CHP...
__________________
Jason H, AT1(AW), USN 2002-present (95 ATX) Wanna know what I'm doing right now? I'm operating what's behind this link. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
This ATX SHO has no turbo and reads 372/366.
__________________
My TCCA Garage 1995 Ford Taurus GL V6 3.0 Vulcan ![]() Clubs: TCCA-West Coast Chapter; SHO-Cal |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Plus, Mustang dynos are notoriously more conservative than many others, so if you tested it on another dyno you could find over 300 at the wheels....
__________________
94 Ultra Red SHO atx 94 Performance White SHO atx 97 White Expedition Eddie Bauer 98 Green Mountaineer former SHOs include white 94 atx, green 93 atx, blue 94 mtx, black 97, black 98, green 95 atx->mtx, blue 93 mtx, blue 93 atx |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
-Sam
__________________
![]() 92 Emerald Green 3.0 MTX - Caged, Cam's, Gutted and Sprayed with never enough Tire - His - **Click here to see it!** 92 Emerald Green 3.2 MTX - Oil Burning, Daily driven, smooth shifting - Hers 89 Titanium 3.0 MTX - Lightly Modded and damned near perfect - Ours 03 Nissan Frontier - Daily Driven |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was going to say something about the fact that it was on a mustang dyno. Dynojets are really the only accurate dyno out there... every other kind leaves far too much to operater skill...
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
my car is running insanely rich as anyone from the convention that has driven behind me can back up. So once I get the updated tweecer files that josh is trying to get for me I will be able to take it somewhere and get a decent tune on it and turn the boost up a little bit more and have a fast car again. getting 18-19mpg on the highway sucks.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
SEXY CAR!
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Postwhoring FTL.
This belongs to a guy on another boards Kenne Bell Mustang GT. Now go back to your "SHO".
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
What do you mean by a/f being pig rich, whats she running at/
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
somewhere between burns your eyes and makes you want to pass out.
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Definitely burns your eyes.
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thats pretty rich, but I suppose pig rich is better then really lean no? SHOBOOM!
__________________
1993 mtx 100k green/tan (up on blocks... again) 1994 mtx green/tan (now green/black, thanks to the atx) 136k (3.2 swapped and now the new DD) 1993 atx 169k green/black (was DD, now parted/junked) 1994 atx 159k green/tan (parted/junked) 1994 mtx green/tan 131k (parted/junked) |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Too rich can cause a miss, and **** up sensors as I've found out.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looks about like my NA Dyno graph :cP Get the tune straightened out. I know your car has a lot more in it than that.
__________________
Ron Red 92 MTX 140K Supernatural Meth drinkin' Fire breathing 300+ WHP grocery getter Got Quaife? |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
the atx is 25% drivetrain lose.
thats on the low end for most atx's i know of certain awd trans in the 22 - 25% lose range.. my thoughts... bye bye fwd i vote on the camaro build |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Any more tuning done or updates Alex?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
If you wish to help keep SHOforum running please click the donation button below
![]() |
![]() |