![]() |
|
Register |
FAQ |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
2013 Taurus SHOMotor Week Review, another one in blue! - http://www.autoweek.com/article/2012...IEWS/120319887
__________________
CURRENT: 2010 Fusion Sport SOLD: Black 1998 Taurus SHO |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not a very complimentary review. Seemed biased against this car from the start.
__________________
2010 SHO Cinnamon on umber/black, fully loaded, completely stock |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
That guy's a freaking idiot. His review sounds like a snipping out of his Diary.
__________________
Neno '92 Black in Black |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
he mentions the new sho is for the Ford purists...
Me thinks this article needs an edit for author info: Davey G. Johnson - written from the bottom of Audi's deep pockets. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1999 Taurus SHO - sold 1/15/10 - 160k miles 1995 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC - sold 3/20/11 - 110k miles 1998 Volvo S70 GLT Turbo - daily beater - 180k miles Last edited by roland; 03-16-2012 at 06:26 PM. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Since when is 365 HP a 10 HP increase over the previous model? Sure, a 10 HP increase over the MKS, Flex, and MKT, but not over the previous SHO.
"The Dodge/Chrysler Charger/300 twins offer more fun and feel more American in the best sense of the word." By that do they mean poor fit and finish and lower quality? I'm mostly teasing having not actually checked out any recent Chrysler product. -Rod |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
If you wish to help keep SHOforum running please click the donation button below
![]() |
![]() |